Design algorithms for the following operations for a binary tree T:
• preorderNext(p): Return the position visited after p in a preorder traversal of T (or null if p is the last node visited).
• inorderNext(p): Return the position visited after p in an inorder traversal of T (or null if p is the last node visited).
• postorderNext(p): Return the position visited after p in a postorder traversal of T (or null if p is the last node visited).
What are the worst-case running times of your algorithms?
To design algorithms for the operations preorderNext(p)
, inorderNext(p)
, and postorderNext(p)
for a binary tree T, we can use the following approaches:
Preorder Traversal:
Inorder Traversal:
Postorder Traversal:
The worst-case running time of these algorithms depends on the height of the tree. If the tree is balanced, the worst-case running time would be O(log n) for a tree with n nodes. However, if the tree is skewed (e.g., a degenerate tree), the worst-case running time would be O(n) where n is the number of nodes in the tree. This is because we may need to traverse the entire height of the tree to find the next position.
It's important to note that these algorithms assume the availability of methods to traverse the tree and access the left and right children of a node. The time complexity of these operations depends on the specific tree implementation used.